Added locks around device provider instance usages

This commit is contained in:
DarthAffe committed 2023-06-18 19:54:57 +02:00
1 parent fdc69fdac5
commit 0609e49571
14 files changed
+336 -108

No files matched your search

@@ -20,11 +20,21 @@ public sealed class SteelSeriesDeviceProvider : AbstractRGBDeviceProvider
#region Properties & Fields
// ReSharper disable once InconsistentNaming
private static readonly object _lock = new();
private static SteelSeriesDeviceProvider? _instance;
/// <summary>
/// Gets the singleton <see cref="SteelSeriesDeviceProvider"/> instance.
/// </summary>
public static SteelSeriesDeviceProvider Instance => _instance ?? new SteelSeriesDeviceProvider();
public static SteelSeriesDeviceProvider Instance
{
get
{
lock (_lock)
return _instance ?? new SteelSeriesDeviceProvider();
}
}
private const int VENDOR_ID = 0x1038;
@@ -93,8 +103,11 @@ public sealed class SteelSeriesDeviceProvider : AbstractRGBDeviceProvider
/// <exception cref="InvalidOperationException">Thrown if this constructor is called even if there is already an instance of this class.</exception>
public SteelSeriesDeviceProvider()
{
if (_instance != null) throw new InvalidOperationException($"There can be only one instance of type {nameof(SteelSeriesDeviceProvider)}");
_instance = this;
lock (_lock)
{
if (_instance != null) throw new InvalidOperationException($"There can be only one instance of type {nameof(SteelSeriesDeviceProvider)}");
_instance = this;
}
}
#endregion
@@ -135,12 +148,15 @@ public sealed class SteelSeriesDeviceProvider : AbstractRGBDeviceProvider
/// <inheritdoc />
protected override void Dispose(bool disposing)
{
base.Dispose(disposing);
lock (_lock)
{
base.Dispose(disposing);
try { SteelSeriesSDK.Dispose(); }
catch { /* shit happens */ }
try { SteelSeriesSDK.Dispose(); }
catch { /* shit happens */ }
_instance = null;
_instance = null;
}
}
#endregion